There has never been a grass roots movement (at
least a successful one) in America. However, if we are to save this
nation, we need to start one now.
Goal of a Grass Roots
Movement
Restore the integrity of our election system,
our Constitution, repair the damage that impairs We the People being able to
self-govern our nation, restore our classical liberal values (the ideal of
limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of
individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free
markets).
The net effect of this is that our federal
government would be limited to what it is authorized to do under the
Constitution and We the People (grass roots) have ultimate control over
it. Other than to prevent local despotism (things than undermine the
general welfare), all domestic issues would be handled at the lowest possible
level—by the people, local communities, cities, counties and as absolutely
necessary: at the state level.
In effect, the grass roots movement would be
about restoring and then furthering the Great Experiment in Self-Government by We the People that our founders wanted for the United States
of America.
Any expansion of national/federal government
power would be via the Constitutional amendment process and not by the
unconstitutional means that have been in play for the past 100 plus years in
this nation.
Background as to how we
lost our freedom to a powerful elite
At its founding, each of the colonies (now
states) had a functioning system of government which ended up supporting the
struggle for independence from British rule. After the war against
England started, the colonies developed its first constitution, the Articles
of Confederation, which was sent to the colonies for ratification in 1777
and was ratified by 1781. Time proved it inadequate and a further convention
was convened in 1787, which yielded our current Constitution.
There are many forms of government, and as
Benjamin Franklin was famously quoted as saying when asked about the form of
government developed at the convention, he remarked “A Republic, if you can keep it.”
Having studied history and just extricated
itself from the tyranny of an elitist government, the founding fathers
expressed greater trust in the wisdom of the general population than in those
who sought to gain power over others in order to rule over them. In
effect, our Constitution was to provide a great American experiment in
self-government by We the People.
This new constitution was ratified in 1788, and
in 1789 it held its first Congress. Under the Constitution, each decade a
national census was to be conducted and the House districts
reapportioned. The initial minimum for a House district was 30,000
population, but no maximum was set in the Constitution.
As the colonies (and by then States) had
functioning government systems, they well understood the importance of district
size if the people were to elect representatives of known character who would
actually represent their interests. Congress had two branches, the House
and Senate. The House was to be the people’s house, with representatives
elected for 2 year terms, known and accountable to the people. The Senate
was to have senators who represented the interests of their state and would be
chosen for 6 year terms by the state legislatures (who were comprised of
legislators similarly chosen and accountable to the people,)
A business of the first Congress was to finalize
and send to the states for ratification a set of proposed amendments as our
Bill of Rights. We are taught there were 10 amendments for our Bill of
Rights. That is not true, there were 12. The very first, called Article the First,
was to place a limit on the population size of a Congressional House district,
which would allow district size to grow to a maximum of 50,000
population. However, the version that went out to the states represented
neither of the versions (as approved by the House or Senate), but instead changed
one word (“less” to “more”) in the final clause effectively rendering it
purposeless.
This was the first coup against the concept of
self-government by We the People. It took more
than 50 years after ratification of our Constitution for House districts to
grow larger than the maximum approved for Article the First by the 1789
congress. By then the founder’s were
dead. Strangely, we don’t hear about it, it is not taught in schools nor
by the pundits. Plain and simple, people are not taught the importance
of small representative districts in order for the people to know and control
who they elect to represent them. Perhaps it is because it is not taught
or discussed that the enemies of our republic were able to effectively destroy We the People’s (the grass roots) ability to control the
representation in Congress.
For those who seek to gain power over others, it
is much easier to do so when the number of people critical to the process is
kept as small as possible—as it is easier to control (corrupt) a small group
than a large one.
Gradually, district size grew to over 200,000
population by the beginning of the 1900’s. A public ignorant of the
critical importance of district size, became captive to party politics and
powerful special interests in regard to the selection of candidates to the
point that what went on in Congress was in most cases independent of the will
or desires of the grass roots.
The 17th Amendment was passed, changing the
method of selecting U.S. Senators from that of the state legislatures to a
statewide election process. While this sounded great to the naïve, it was
a boon to the powerful special interests, for they only had to corrupt one
candidate that they supported in order to gain a Senator, instead of having to
corrupt a majority of each state’s legislators.
Even with the early defeat of Article the First
and the virtual squelching of all discussion of the importance of district
size, the House of Representatives was still growing in size and becoming
increasingly difficult for the power brokers to control. Thus, it was
critical for the power brokers to limit the size of the House of
Representatives and in 1911 an apportionment act was passed by Congress, to
limit the size of the House of Representatives to 435 members, as it remains to
this day, where the average size of a House district exceeds 750,000 and
growing in size in direct proportion to the population growth.
Under such conditions, it is no wonder that the
grass roots has lost control over both houses of Congress. After all,
that is the way the power brokers worked it to be.
Our Constitution was created to be a “living
Constitution” in the sense that Article V of the Constitution provided various
methods to amend it.
However, those who sought to have power over We
the People, saw the amendment process too difficult for them to expand the
powers of the national (we call federal) government—in order to impose changes
that otherwise We the People would not endorse. President Wilson famously
promoted the idea of a “living Constitution” and by this he meant inventing
methods—in fact unconstitutional methods—by which the three branches of the
federal government could amend it by circumventing the legal Constitutional
amendment process.
As a consequence, starting with such as the
Federal Reserve Act and then the New Deal, the Great Society, the War on
Poverty, as with an abundance of court cases, the federal government has
exceeded its limited
powers under the Constitution, to usurp, especially in regard to domestic
issues—what had been the prerogatives of the states, local municipalities or
the people.
At this point, a vast number of us cannot even
trust the integrity of our election process. The power brokers have
created regulations and licenses to restrict businesses, which in fact are able
to harm the general welfare of our nation and undermine its founding
concepts. As expressed multiple times, at this point in time these four issues must be addressed if
we are to restore a semblance of self-government to We
the People to this nation.
Basically, I see we have two choices in
government in the United States: 1) Allow a class of powerful elites to
continue to rule this nation in disregard for our Constitution and will of the
people, or 2) Educate the grass roots to the point they demand the basic
changes necessary to restore the founder’s design for self-government at the
federal level, as well as restore state and local government to the people and
essentially independent of the federal government.
If there was ever a need for a real grass
movement—to grow and take charge of this nation from the powerful elite—I see
this as the time.
In the past, I tried to get involved in my
political party’s county central committee, and soon discovered it was simply a
top down organization with no interest in grass roots ideas or creative input.
Many of you got involved in the early Tea Party
movement that occurred, primarily starting in early 2009. The early rallies,
such as the April 15 Rally in Sacramento, was inspiring and hopeful.
This was followed by the formation of local Tea
Party groups that started to hold weekly meetings, primarily in
restaurants. Despite a hopeful start, it fizzled as it turned into some
rather perfunctory meetings with a guest speaker. There was no real
local, national cohesion or overall agenda, vision, or plan—thus it fizzled.
The fact is, and should be obvious to a vast
number of Americans; the swamp, the Left, the
power elites have done everything they can to divide us from one another into
factions, isolate us from one another from face to face meaningful interaction,
and to control us by the force of government, be it regulations, taxation,
mandates and increasingly tyrannical methods.
At this point in time, the sheer magnitude of
interlocking bureaucracies, regulations, subsidies and other interactions between
the federal, state and local government—is such a maze of complexity that it is
mind boggling to comprehend, let alone consider seriously rectifying.
Starting a grass roots
movement
For a grass roots movement to take hold and
effect the needed change, it must be both a national as well as local
movement—with the local sharing similar concerns, but not controlled by the
national. We were not designed (at our nation’s founding) to be a one
size fits all top down system.
As we have never had a functional grass roots
movement in the United States, or possibly elsewhere in the world, it is a
novel endeavor—the breaking of new ground. The purpose of the movement is
to restore the concept of self-government to the people. And, not everyone
is supportive of that. 1) Many want control and power over others, and
unfortunately, thanks to the federal overreach over the past century, 2) many
are either employed by the government system and would oppose changes that
could jeopardize their livelihood and security, and of course 3) many are the
recipients of government programs and would be opposed to losing their
government welfare benefits....this includes subsidies and benefits to
industry, agriculture as well as individuals.
Of the three groups listed above, we must
consider those in group 1), those who want control and power over us as the
enemy—as those who will fight us tooth and nail to prevent self-government by
the people to work. Their primary tools are disinformation (promoting a
biased perspective and an agenda that suits their purpose), as well as fear,
and intimidation.
The other two groups must be converted to see
the wisdom of the Classical liberal position, the philosophy committed to the
ideal of limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and
liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly,
and free markets. That under such a system, we can maximize the
opportunity for everyone in society to enjoy the blessings of a decent life...better
than experienced in other nations or previous generations.
Just as the Humpty Dumpty rhyme goes, once you
do damage, it is not easy to repair a broken system—which will require massive
dismantling of existing counterproductive systems throughout our society in
order to fix.
EDUCATION – At the local and at the national level we need to call upon
creative expertise to find ways to educate the nation to our Constitution, how
it has been undermined, and what it could be like if we united to fix the system.
This will require educational videos, local educational meetings/seminars, and
most important: we need to develop inspirational dramatic films that
entertain, enlighten, enrage and motivate the public. While these four points are essential to the
education, the last point regarding election fraud is of
immediate need to protect our system from a total collapse. We must push
to develop a national referendum sufficient to force our Congress to enact
(enough to override a veto if necessary) election reform.
Of course education extends beyond that.
We cannot continue to allow the government bureaucratized and unionized tax
payer funded system to both dumb down and indoctrinate our youth. We must
push for immediate universal choice in education...public, private, parochial,
home school, work/study, and other healthy options to suit individual needs.
RESTORE COMMUNITY – While email and the internet are valuable resources, social
networks is not a substitute for face to face human interaction. Small
groups of a couple, preferably a dozen or less people is a place to
begin. The meetings should be informal, fun, and yet with a purpose. A
starting point might be in restaurants, churches, homes, and have a large
screen TV hooked up to a computer, where some video can be played. As
there is little useful video at this time, one might use the website www.PolicyUSA.com and access some of the
articles for discussion—as a start.
I would suggest that the average person has
little interest in any sort of intense involvement, but educating them to the
basics of civics and especially the need to address these four points is
essential. Without belaboring the point, we need to restore community
interaction on the issues that impact our lives.
The Left and the swamp would like to picture any
such grass roots meeting as some sort of insurrection movement. And many
still believe our major institutions as gospel. Care should be exerted
not to try to convince people of the ills of society, but instead promote
insight to civics and to healthy discussion. Like a personal experience
of God, it does not happen because someone forces it upon you. We have to
trust that each individual, in their own time, if exposed to healthy discourse,
will eventually see reality without it being forced upon them. To win
this nation back to its founding principles is not a partisan issue—and the
Republicans can be as swampy and counterproductive as anyone.
As citizen involvement aside from voting is
virtually unknown for most, a serious topic to be discussed is the reality of
how the local community can regain control from the existing bureaucratic and
interconnected system existing today. Education regarding the
interconnectivity and funding issues have evolved and choke citizen control can
be illuminating without seeming conspiratorial.
Our goal is to restore local control over the
issues that affect the community. Among other things, this includes
education, housing, use and development of private property, local values,
criminal justice, vagrancy homeless and unemployed....as well as all the things
government regulates, especially housing and businesses that has more to do
with furthering certain industries and protecting businesses from competition
than benefitting society at large.
Without simply riling people up, we need to
educate and get people pointed to a healthy track from which we can gradually
and sometimes rapidly effect change. Educating people in an entertaining
and hopefully fun way would be a healthy way to move in that direction. A
weekly meeting, with purpose, sharing ideas and small enough people are not
intimidated from sharing would be a good start.
But most important of all, we need to start
broadening our interaction with others in our community.
DEVELOP HEALTHY
TERMINOLOGY – As a classical
liberal, I keep hearing people on the supposed right refer to themselves and
others as “conservatives” and the color ‘RED”. If someone calls
themselves a conservative, I can only guess what they believe—but it is just a
guess—they may very well be a simple compromised RINO for all I know. And
referring to a community or state that is predominately supporting our
Constitution and freedom as a RED state makes me cringe every time I hear
it—and I have been hearing it for over 20 years now.
The Left adopts terminology and symbols that
benefit their agenda and undermine the opposition (opposition being those who
believe in our nation’s founding values and the Constitution). Not only
do they use language and symbols to further their agenda, they use terminology
to fool the naïve into thinking they are the good guys.
I would never refer to a Leftist as a
liberal. They are anything but liberal. They might be “libertines”
promoting every type of degeneracy in order to undermine society, but in
fact—when push comes to shove—they are intolerant, power mongers that pursue a
narrow minded, bigoted, social ideology that is disastrous to every nation and
society that has tried to implement it.
So, we need to get smart and consistent.
Unlike the Left, we are not out to deceive, we are out to educate, and
transform our system back to one that promotes the maximum degree of freedom
and opportunity it can, while dealing with the reality of mankind.
Some of my suggestions:
Always refer to the Left as the Left, the swamp,
the degenerates, the liars, the schemers (whatever) –
but never call them liberals. Being considered as “liberal” is a good
term, and in today’s society a drawing card the Left can use to attract those
who are politically naïve. We have to take back that term and not let the
Left get away with it.
And in regard to the term “conservative”, I
would give up using that term entirely and switch to terms like liberal,
classical liberal, patriot, or some other term that a politically naïve person
would find attractive. As it is, not only do I not know what a person who
labels themselves as a “conservative” actually believe, it conjures up images
in my mind of some narrow minded bigot who is not open to change. Why do
that?
Caution when using the term “law and
order.” When Trump used that term during his campaign, I would bet he
turned many off—I know he turned me off, because so much of our laws and
especially the implementation of our justice system is lopsided and anything
but healthy. The term law and order can easily be synonymous with a police
state—and I doubt many of us who love our Constitutional republic want the
tyranny of a police state.
Stop referring to the Republican dominant states
as RED states. Especially for the naïve, the immediate reaction in regard
to the color RED politically is that it refers to Nazi Germany, Red China, Red Russia – in fact it is analogous to calling the
Republican dominant states as fascists, communists, dictatorships, etc.
Stop doing it. If you have to use a color, use the color BLUE, which most
people identify as a patriotic color. Here is an article I
wrote on the color issue a few years back.
Anyway, I am not going to go further at this
time with the subject. The point is, we need to use terminology that the
least politically aware people in society will find attractive, rather than
negative. I believe the patriots in this nation lose a lot of close
elections because they use terminology that is offensive, misunderstood, and
turns off the voter. We must stop that.
In regard to terminology, we need to promote
positive terminology that promotes understanding and does not turn off the
naïve.
STOP THE UNSCIENTIFIC
DIVISION – Many justified the
institution of slavery by promoting the idea that Africans were of a different
race. Our schools teach our children, from the earliest age, that there
are different races of mankind. Just about every government form and many
non-government forms, ask us to identify which ethnic or racial group we are
in. This is evil and promotes exactly the type of division we want to
minimize or eliminate.
Currently, especially since 2009, division
between people of differing ethnic and supposed racial lines has escalated to
the point of crisis—and getting worse, not better. We must reverse
that.
Scientifically, it has been proven that there is only one race in
regard to us humans and we are all descended from common ancestry. We
need to promote that, and we need to both discourage and seek to outlaw the
practice of both teaching there are different races as well, as such on
applications and forms used by business and government.
While bigotry and hatred of differences is not
going to be erased from the human genome, we do not have to feed in to it, and
we can certainly work to minimize it.
PROMOTING A HEALTHY
VISION – We aren’t going to make much progress without
painting a healthy vision of how society can operate if we work to restore the
founder’s vision of a limited national government where We
the People were in charge—instead of a powerful elite.
The quality of life we could enjoy if we weren’t
paying a significant share of our income to pay for counterproductive
government services, many of which hinder our freedom and opportunities.
Domestically, how richly diverse our neighborhoods, cities, and states could
become if not forced to comply with top down mandates by those who wish to
control us and curb our freedoms—those elites that simply know better how to
live our lives than we do.
Books, major motion pictures, so much needs to
be written and said in this regard....
But for now, I am going to stop. This is
just some of my thoughts on a Grass Roots movement—that I believe is absolutely
essential if we are to turn this nation around—let alone save it from utter
destruction.