So much of what the pundits say that is taken as
wisdom falls apart under scrutiny—scrutiny that seldom comes to light.
Listening to Mark Levin promote the Convention
of States during his CPAC presentation caused me to think about the above
cartoon.
A month or so back, listening to the Tucker
Carlson show, he did an interview of Mark Meckler, the prime proponent of the Convention of States
agenda.
Please provide feedback, especially if you
disagree with me. But, I see zero benefit in such a convention to develop
amendments to our Constitution.
Pundits always go for good sounding solutions,
but solutions nevertheless that will not solve the problem. Case in point
“term limits.” We have term limits here in California, how well is that
doing for us? Not so good. If you happen to get a good
representative, one who will fight tooth and nail for what is best for this
nation and the general welfare—do you want him or her excluded in the next
election due to term limits? I think not. The real problem is not
term limits, the problem is that We the People do not
have control over the process of selecting and electing the people we want to
represent us.
Attached
is the flyer for the Convention of States organization. I fail to see a
Convention of States worth pursuing at this time. Mainly because of two
factors that stand out to me: First, in my book the preponderance of
elected officials are part of the swamp and it appears that a convention of
states would be largely staffed by such. Secondly, as I look over the
laundry list of proposed amendments on pages 30-31 of the pocket guide, other
than the top three, I don’t see any (including the top three) that addresses
the root cause of our nation’s demise. And, once a Convention is in
progress, all kinds of spurious—good sounding—amendments can be proposed, which
lack true wisdom and would just further add to the problems we face if
ratified.
But, as far as amendments go, the important one
to me, and I would think to most people if they were educated to the facts, is
the rescinding of the 17th Amendment, which changed the method of selecting
U.S. Senators. As a consequence of the 17th Amendment, the power of
selection shifted towards big money and special interests largely controlling
the outcome.
For years now I have been pushing my four points.
In my book, these are the critical issues, which because these are not dealt
with—all our other ills grow. If you want to drain the swamp, focus on
those four points.
·
Self-government plain
and simple cannot work if We the People are not in
control over the selection of our Congressional representatives.
·
Second, if we do not
limit our Federal government to its authorities and responsibilities contained
in the Constitution, then we end up with runaway government and growing tyranny
as we have now.
·
Third, if we allow large
corporations, NGOs and non-profits to work to the detriment of the public good,
our freedoms are undermined. The virtual corporate monopoly of the
mainstream media is a prime example.
·
And lastly, if we cannot
trust the fairness of our election system, then we have lost all control over
our government.
None of this is being addressed by the
proponents of the Convention of States—and it does not take a Convention of
States to address these issues. Instead, it takes a process of educating
the public and teaching them to work together at the grass roots—something we
have lost the ability to do.
What do you think? To me it would be great
to give this
a shot!